On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:38:41PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> 
> The first part about parser behaviour still doesn’t make much sense to me and 
> may be misinterpreted. I think that even a parser that does understand an 
> extension may ignore it. It all depends on what the parser output is used for.
>

Oh boy - very high level of nitpicking.

> I would just say (somewhere) that descriptions and extensions are integral 
> and binding parts of the data model. Unless I missed something, it is not 
> clearly stated for descriptions either.

I tried to say so. Looking forward to your improved proposal.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to