> On 29 Jul 2015, at 16:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:38:41PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >> The first part about parser behaviour still doesn’t make much sense to me >> and may be misinterpreted. I think that even a parser that does understand >> an extension may ignore it. It all depends on what the parser output is used >> for. >> > > Oh boy - very high level of nitpicking. > >> I would just say (somewhere) that descriptions and extensions are integral >> and binding parts of the data model. Unless I missed something, it is not >> clearly stated for descriptions either. > > I tried to say so. Looking forward to your improved proposal. >
OK, here it is: Sec. 7.21.3 ----------- Add this paragraph at the end: Constraints and rules stated in the text of a “description” statement are an integral and binding part of the data model. Sec. 6.3.1 ---------- OLD If a YANG compiler does not support a particular extension, which appears in a YANG module as an unknown-statement (see Section 13), the entire unknown-statement MAY be ignored by the compiler. NEW Extensions and their semantics as defined by the corresponding “extension” statement are an integral and binding part of the data model. Lada > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
