On 12/22/2015 1:55 PM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
On Dec 22, 2015:6:38 AM, at 6:38 AM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
Jürgen,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
I hope that nobody disagrees that the operational state design and how
to structure the models are the two blocking factors to publish YANG
models. If you disagree or don't see this, let me know, I should
communicate better.
Even if it may spoil your day, I disagree that there is a blocking
factor that should stop us from publishing models.
Interestingly, I received that feedback again recently, this time from the OSPF
and ISIS YANG model authors.
This is a blocking factor that people are not considering: The RFC
process the
IETF has in place is not suitable for rapid/modern/canonical model development.
It will
be difficult for the IESG review process to scale to even a couple models
during any given
telechat period given the state of the document review/approval process. How do
we
envision the IESG reviewing 250+ models (and growing)? Besides the initial RFC
version,
rapid refresh/update of models has the same issues.
I don't disagree, but I propose that we stick to the oper state
discussion in this email thread.
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
