Hi Iftekhar,

Thanks for the comments and support, please see inline ...


On 15/12/2016 18:55, Iftekhar Hussain wrote:
Yes/support.

I have read this draft and believe it would be very useful for enabling many 
Layer 2 and Layer 3 services.

However, I do have few comments and that I would like the authors to address 
once the document is a WG document.

a)  Suggest to replace this text:
     "These modules allow IETF forwarding protocols (such as IPv6 and VPLS) ..."
      with the following text:
     " These modules allow configuration Layer 2 and Layer 3 subinterfaces (e.g., 
attachment circuits) for providing for IETF L2VPN (e.g., VPWS, VPLS, EVPN) and L3VPN 
services".
Yes, OK.  I think that this text can be tweaked.


b) The document should clearly identify the scope. For example, suggest replace 
this text:
         "... to interoperate with VLAN tagged traffic orginated from an IEEE 802.1Q 
compliant bridge".
        with the following text:
        "... to interoperate with traffic originated from an IEEE 802.1D, 802.1Q, or 
802.1AD compliant bridge."

    Note: In the data model, the draft is talking about untagged as well as 802.1AD (see  
"tag type (802.1Q or 802.1ad)")
Yes, it should mention 802.1D. 802.1ad is part of 802.1Q. The draft would be best referring to S-VLANs vs C-VLANs rather than 802.1Q vs 802.1ad.

c) Are there any sub-interface level common statistics counters that the model should address? Currently, I don't see any.
A sub-interface is still just an interface, so by default it would pick up all of RFC7223 interface statistics. Were you looking for any additional specific statistics?

However, it would probably be useful to have a counter on the parent trunk to indicate the number of packets that haven't been matched to any sub-interface, so I think that I should add that.

Thanks,
Rob


Thanks,
Iftekhar
-----Original Message-----
From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 3:32 PM
To: NetMod WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04

All,

This is start of a two week* poll on making
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group document.

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  
If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free 
to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

* Given the holiday, the poll ends December 28.

Thank you,
NetMod WG Chairs

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to