support a couple of quick Qs for the authors:
1) is there a reason why you have the “tags” container in the L3 interface but don’t have equivalents in the flexible encapsulation model? since the “tags” container is the only thing inside the enclosing “vlan” container I’m not sure it’s required. 2) would it be better to rename “push-tags” as “push-tag” to stick with the convention of singular names for YANG lists? Giles > On 12 Dec 2016, at 23:31, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > This is start of a two week* poll on making > draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group > document. > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like > to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > * Given the holiday, the poll ends December 28. > > Thank you, > NetMod WG Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
