Hi Giles,
Thanks for the support, and comments.
On 19/12/2016 19:37, Giles Heron wrote:
support
a couple of quick Qs for the authors:
1) is there a reason why you have the “tags” container in the L3 interface but
don’t have equivalents in the flexible encapsulation model? since the “tags”
container is the only thing inside the enclosing “vlan” container I’m not sure
it’s required.
I agree that these should be consistent, although I'm not sure which one
should be changed. Perhaps adding the tags container to the flexible
encapsulation would be more consistent. I thought that it was always
good practice to put a list into a container?
2) would it be better to rename “push-tags” as “push-tag” to stick with the
convention of singular names for YANG lists?
Yes. I can also fix that.
Thanks,
Rob
Giles
On 12 Dec 2016, at 23:31, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
All,
This is start of a two week* poll on making
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group
document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
* Given the holiday, the poll ends December 28.
Thank you,
NetMod WG Chairs
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
