Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

[Kent Watsen]

>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
>> 
>
> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not. Perhaps we should have text
> saying that tree diagrams are expected to be generated by tools and
> that they are expected to be consistent with the model (and hence they
> need to be updated with every change, hence usage of tools is a damn
> good idea).
> 
> [I thought this is obvious but perhaps this is not.]


Right, but what happens when the draft precedes the tool being
updated (e.g., schema-mount)?  It's a rare case and you already
said authors can address it on a case-by-case basis, so I think
we're covered either way.

K.


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod