Hi Juergen, 

On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected] on behalf of
[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> 
>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
>> 
>
>Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.

I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees to get them
to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this that I don¹t
know about? 

Thanks,
Acee







>Perhaps we should have text
>saying that tree diagrams are expected to be generated by tools and
>that they are expected to be consistent with the model (and hence they
>need to be updated with every change, hence usage of tools is a damn
>good idea).
>
>[I thought this is obvious but perhaps this is not.]
>
>/js
>
>-- 
>Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to