On 13/03/2017 19:07, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
FYI - just slapped together and published:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00>
Lou
(as contributor)
PS I'm happy with the definition being in 6780bis or in a
standalone doc
(as above), but really think we as a WG need to decide ASAP so as
not to
hold up 6780bis any further...
standalone doc is fine.
does this mean the contents of the tree diagram and the syntax for the
tree diagram are subject to WG consensus?
That would seem to make sense, given that they are used in all drafts
describing YANG models.
Rob
Andy
On 3/13/2017 2:20 PM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Would it make sense to update 6087bis section 4.4 to reference
this new
> pyang option for generated tree diagrams?
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On 11/03/2017 21:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen,
>>>
>>> On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on
behalf of
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>>>>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but
also this
>>>>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f
tree`
>>>>> and then manually edit from there). What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.
>>> I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees
to get them
>>> to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this
that I don¹t
>>> know about?
>> In the latest pyang, I have added --tree-line-length. Use:
>>
>> pyang -f -tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
>>
>> to fit RFCs.
>>
>>
>> /martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>> .
>>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
