Hi Andy,
Would it make sense to update 6087bis section 4.4 to reference this new
pyang option for generated tree diagrams?
Thanks,
Rob
On 11/03/2017 21:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected] on behalf of
[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
and then manually edit from there). What do you think?
Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.
I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees to get them
to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this that I don¹t
know about?
In the latest pyang, I have added --tree-line-length. Use:
pyang -f -tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
to fit RFCs.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
