On Sunday 20 September 2009, Kingsly John wrote: > +++ Anivar Aravind [2009-09-20 16:43:44]: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Agenda for proposed meet > > 1) Discuss CMP > > 2) Finalise CMP > > > > > > my only fear is CMP may reduce the possibilities taking up new issues > > which is not in a familiar format. Discussion from time to time is needed > > for that
FSF is always available for more diffused areas related to FLOSS. > > That is the whole point of the CMP, to ensure that we have clear focus. > > With the kind of noise levels on this list, it's a matter of time before > people start losing interest (if they haven't already.) > > Anything that doesn't conform to the CMP should be taken elsewhere. As it stands there are ample disjointed adhoc interventions happenning. The whole point of FOSSCOM was to setup an organisation through which a few important interventions may be initiated and carried to successful conclusion at the highest and most important decision making bodies. -- Rgds JTD _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
