On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 17:17, Vickram Crishna <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2. What direction and role do you see yourself playing, if any. > > At this stage, I am already helping out with general editing on public
JFTR, the 'you' above is impersonal and not a "show me the code" and thanks for helping out with the wiki. That said, here is the link for the first initiative which is todays flosscomm. http://mailman.linuxchix.org/pipermail/indichix/attachments/20090217/d67910b4/attachment.htm > documents. I do not want to constrain further directions for either this > group or for myself, having come in a bit late (around June, I think). otoh, > I am quite happy, as you may have guessed, to see this list focused on CMP, As mentioned earlier in the thread, the CMP is the first step and maybe in future towards a Membership Criteria (individual and Organisation) as suggested by Anivar. Then, http://lists.fosscom.in/pipermail/network-fosscom.in/2009-May/000090.html In particular point #0 after the CMP is defined and the fosscomm community decides to becomes a legal entity. I understand the importance of having meetings and more offline meetings in every Indian city and online discussions, or rants on lists/blogs, etc.. but its been many months since Bangalore in February and the second Delhi meet in July. So what next? How does YAML transcend this stage? > Instead, please try and capture the essential points on a wikified document, capture what on the wiki? Kenneth had already sent a mail to the list for discussion : http://lists.fosscom.in/pipermail/network-fosscom.in/2009-June/000296.html and so did Nagarjuna yesterday. Not everyone has a wiki account and discussions on the list are far easier than checking out revision history on a wiki -- tiresome at times. > committees and the like. It's just that I don't like to read about > dismissing the former to unnamed lists, when it is clear (to me) that this > list attracts a better quality of discussion overall. as others have mentioned earlier, there are many many local ILUG and fsf-lists, to name a few. What is unnamed about those lists and what aspect of floss discussion do they not encourage? Can you be specific. As for university committees, some Univ's promote IP. Where does that leave them with respect to fosscomm -- they may not want to be a part of this if we take a hard-line stance on everything. -- vid http://vid.svaksha.com || _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
