On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:48 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 20 September 2009, Kingsly John wrote: >> +++ Anivar Aravind [2009-09-20 16:43:44]: >> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Agenda for proposed meet >> > 1) Discuss CMP >> > 2) Finalise CMP >> > >> > >> > my only fear is CMP may reduce the possibilities taking up new issues >> > which is not in a familiar format. Discussion from time to time is needed >> > for that > > FSF is always available for more diffused areas related to FLOSS. > >> >> That is the whole point of the CMP, to ensure that we have clear focus. >> >> With the kind of noise levels on this list, it's a matter of time before >> people start losing interest (if they haven't already.) >> >> Anything that doesn't conform to the CMP should be taken elsewhere. > > As it stands there are ample disjointed adhoc interventions happenning. The > whole point of FOSSCOM was to setup an organisation through which a few > important interventions may be initiated and carried to successful > conclusion at the highest and most important decision making bodies. >
Totally Agreed Anivar _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
