On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:54, prabir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>     1. foss for learning and teaching (not only ICT but education in
>>>        general)
>>>
>>>     2. exchanging and storing digital media and documents in
>>>        free/open standards
>>>
>>>     3. accessibility (including localization, accessibility and
>>>        internationalization) of applications, media and documents.
>
> Do we need this as an additional item? Not clear what this means,
> unless we mean promotion of localisation.

Isnt there indlinux working on localization, besides cdac, etc...

>>>
>>>     4. availability of public funded project results in public domain
>>>        or copyleft Domain
>>>
>>>     5. resisting legislation of software patents, copyright amendment or 
>>> trade
>>>        related laws that may directly affect software freedom.
> As I have argued earlier, this should  be a part of FOSS core work.
> Would rephrase it as it is not only resisting legislation (could mean
> restricting it to new legislation only, while the problem is with also
> the interpretation of law by courts and the patent office. However,
> that is a matter of detail.
>
>>>
>>>     6. creation of public archives of free software
>>>
>>>     7. free drivers for all marketed hardware, and work towards
>>> free/open hardware
> Does this mean that any hardware sold in India should have free
> drivers or we will help promote such hardware or...Also do not
> understand free/open hardware. Open hardware yes, free hardware?

I dont want to speculate but on first reading this seems to be
co-related with #5.

>>
>> Thanks. Am trying to understand the convergence between the IN list
>> above and the earlier proposal[0], except for #5 which gets a -1. So
>> how can these two proposals be assimilated?
> A simple assimilation of the two proposals would be first to agree on
> the points,

Its not so easy. Actually, its the simple wording that is saying and
yet leaving many things unsaid. As i said earlier, #7 reads to depend
on #5 being agreed to in toto.
Hence my request for a clarification on how Kenneth's CMP and this
could be merged. Please i dont want to quibble on the word CMP itself.

-- 
vid
http://vid.svaksha.com ||
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to