+++ prabir [2009-09-24 11:31:27]: > Differences exist within the FOSSCOMM group, need to be sorted out. > There is a negative and positive for any CMP (Com Min prog), how many > will leave then to build another coalition to include the items left > out, and how many will leave if certain items are left out.
A CMP should be designed to retain everyone that's currently on board and
bring more people/organisations in the future. This whole attitude of let
people leave/ start another coalition is disturbing.
People will leave/not join if certain items are added to the CMP. But there
is no reason for people to leave because some items are left out.
Just becuase certain items are left out of the CMP doesn't prevent the
members from taking up those issues on their own personal steam.
If the idea behing FOSSCOM is to lobby the govt. stuff like open/free
hardware or even drivers doesn't have a place here.
FOSSCOM CMP will always remain a subset of the FSF's objectives if we seek to
build a broad coalition. Other wise we could have just launched an FSF
membership drive.
Kingsly
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kingsly At Users Dot SourceForge Dot Net -- http://kingsly.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgp3LyGIaUcMi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
