On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Krishnakant Mane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Very true JTD very true.
> I have experienced this to a very great extent when I went ahead in the
> media.
> I always knew that they will for one thing never look at our ideology as an
> ideology or revolution in the first place.
> quotes like "although foss is becoming popular due to its high quality and
> stability, they still lack support and organised development.  it will be a
> long time before foss is really into the industry " is a common ending or
> conclusion to so called pro foss articles.
> This is because free software developers are always dubbed as " enthusiasts"
> and that sounds to most readers as "people with hobbies but no professional
> approach".
> Often we here from the media "well, your proposed alternatives have good
> quality but M$ and the likes have professionalism.  your software is still
> not a competitor to proprietory softwares, let's give people the *choice*"
> and from there the unbiased reporting as JTD stated starts taking place.
>

That is the standard 'framing effect' and is usually traceable to
'higher ups' in the media industry.
Normally *non conforming* journalists, especially in non s/w areas,
will never be able to get a job in the first place. OSS has some big
corporate backing and so more can be expected.


Best

A. Mani



-- 
A. Mani
ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to