On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:39 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 16 December 2010 14:04:09 Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:51 PM, jtd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:49:48 Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > > > INAL. TINLA. > > > > > > > > Well, is this my first article against Creative Commons > > > > License. actually not. I am not against any license scheme. I > > > > want to express in this article is creative commons and > > > > anyother license is not made for you - (the normal public). > > > > There are better license exist which can help you for creative > > > > a better world. > > > > Lets us first discuss some of the things. > > > > > > > > *For whom this article made for* > > > > * *This article is made for user who have small > > > > understanding over license and other similar thing. > > > > > > While I commiserate with you on the legalise in various licences, > > > I would strongly recommend anyone creating copyrighted works to > > > read copyright law and licences sufficiently to be able to use > > > some of them for their own works. It is mandatory, more so if you > > > intend to create your own licence. > > > > > > Ignorance of law is a very weak defence and a disaster in attack. > > > > > > The newspapers in Mumbai carried an article on a C spat in Mumbai > > > HC, between the claimed inheritors of the scripts of "Jaane Bhi > > > Do Yaro" and the claimed holders of the copyright. 17 years after > > > the script writer died and 25 years after the serial stopped. > > > > > > There have been similiar spats between Naushad Ali the music > > > director and the erstwhile HMV/Gramaphone Company of India. Afaik > > > it was about those ghastly remixes. > > > > > > Without sitting with a copyright law team, that has a good > > > understanding of copyleft principals, trying to forge a licence > > > is pointless. > > > > My sole purpose was to have discussion. May you direct me some 2-3 > > guys which whom I can sit and discuss. > > I understand that this was intended as a discussion - it still hasnt > erupted into flames. > But discussing creation of a new licence requires interaction with a > legal team alongwith the community. All the other licences have had > this interaction. You would first have to check out all the others, > pinpoint the defeciencies and your missing needs, then proceed to > this discussion. > You might have gauged that a new licence is a bigger can of worms than > the existing licences. Refer to the 3 year long rukus over GPL V3. > > -- > Rgds > JTD >
Will create a videos on all these thought and need for highly permissive viral license. Thanks -- ┌─────────────────────────┐ │ Narendra Sisodiya │ http://narendrasisodiya.com └─────────────────────────┘
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
