On Saturday 28 Jan 2012, Guru गुरु wrote: > On 28/01/12 10:39, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote: > > I'm afraid I don't have answers to any of these questions; however > > I do believe they need to be raised and discussed and reasonable, > > practical solutions found before implementation of such a scheme > > begins. > > Yes the points you raise are valid. Thats why, perhaps we should just > begin with a simple list of resource persons/institutions without > making any qualification (caveat emptor). and as we discuss and find > answers to these questions, enhance the list with additional > attributes to make it more useful. > > Can the list administrator make a wiki as HS Rai suggested, and I can > update it with the 3 names I have received (request interested > others to update the wiki or mail the list so we can update the > wiki)
If we're only making a list without adding any value, why not let the consultants just use an existing resource like http://www.commandprompt.com/community/consultants/guide/ or http://www.linuxselfhelp.com/howtos/Consultants/Consultants-HOWTO.html , encourage members to add their information there, and give a pointer to the meta-resource on the wiki? For instance, the first one already has a list of ~150 consultants from India. Is there any point in duplicating an existing effort? Regards, -- Raj -- Raj Mathur || [email protected] || GPG: http://otheronepercent.blogspot.com || http://kandalaya.org || CC68 It is the mind that moves || http://schizoid.in || D17F _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
