Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > We could print a debug message saying that the dladm handle could not > be > > > > opened and mod_init failed. The rcm_daemon would still be running > even > > > > if a modules fails to initialize and needs to be restarted to do > > > > anything useful. > > > > > > I'd think it should be more than a debug message. > > > > rcm_mod_init does not return any error code. When anything fails, it > > simply returns NULL. This is what all the modules do (e.g. > > cmd/rcm_daemon/common/svm_rcm.c). > > I dont know what else rcm_mod_init can do other than returning NULL in > > case of failure. > > It cannot produce a warning message via rcm_log_message()? > > Thats what I meant by a debug message. It could log one by calling rcm_log_message(RCM_WARNING,......). _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Peter Memishian
