Peter Memishian wrote: > > > Thanks. The updated webrev is in the same location > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vassun08/6793859-commentsfix/ > > So now we just silently fail to an the RCM module if dladm_open() fails? > That doesn't seem ideal. > > We could print a debug message saying that the dladm handle could not be opened and mod_init failed. The rcm_daemon would still be running even if a modules fails to initialize and needs to be restarted to do anything useful. _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6793859 Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 67938... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review for 6... Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Sebastien Roy
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Peter Memishian
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Vasumathi Sundaram
- Re: [networking-discuss] Code Review f... Peter Memishian
