Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in?

[Bill Stoddard]

> Well, why not do the same as we've done for APR?  I don't see why mod_proxy
> can be "bundled" in the same way can't it?  It seems to make sense as both
> an included "entity" and a seperate project.
>

I can go with that.  Ship mod_proxy with http server releases but maintain it as a
seperate project.  I would really not like to see it supported like, say, mod_perl or
mod_dav in Apache 1.3 (i.e., not bundled with an http server release).

Bill