Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Same here. I think the separate nature has been quite good for mod_proxy,
> and it could continue very well on its own, with separate release schedules
> and whatnot. It definitely needs to be more prominent, so that people know
> where to go, how to get it, etc, but that is mostly some wordsmithing on web
> pages and stuff.
>
> I'd say -0 on integration. Not that it shouldn't be in httpd-2.0, but that I
> believe it could accomplish more by remaining separate.
>
2 dangerous thoughts :)
1. I forget... is mod_proxy it's own project (ala apr?) If not,
it should be.
2. There was some initial discussion on having mod_rewrite
also follow a similar path. Certainly it was a good idea
for mod_proxy. Maybe it could help mod_rewrite as well.
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."
