Wow. That's what I get for taking a day trip. 8^) Now we're in a conundrum. I count 4 unconditional +1, one conditional +1, and one -0. But the discussion has switched direction. Does anyone want to rescind or change a vote? That's all for the procedural crapola. On Wednesday, April 18, 2001, at 03:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > David Reid wrote: >> >> Isn't that what we're already doing with APR and APR-Util? They are >> standalone projects but when you get a tarball of apache it has them >> included. Wouldn't this be a useful idea for proxy and rewrite as >> well? OB >> and I are on the same page about this just using different words :) >> >> david >> > > Agreed. Chuck Murcko Topsail Group http://www.topsail.org/
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Blue Lang
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? David Reid
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Greg Stein
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Chuck Murcko
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? rbb
- Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in? Graham Leggett
- Build system that could integra... Sean Chittenden
