On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Hey, what's going on with the retagging? There exists on developer dist: > > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 5383847 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 3226188 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc > -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 4305440 Jul 20 13:20 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip > -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 477 Jul 20 13:16 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc > > which means that there are now two different versions of the source being > called 2.0.21? That is bad. I agree. Ditch 2.0.21 and reroll 2.0.22 from scratch, IMO. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Greg Marr
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Gonyou, Austin
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
