From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:08 PM > > We have also dropped the subrevision that was available in > > apache1.3. This seems very wrong to me. Thoughts? > > I can't parse this, what subrevision. the APACHE_RELEASE 10319100 constant. this could easily be adapted to the model I just described... 200xx000 devel 200xx001 alpha_1 200xx002 alpha_2 200xx003 alpha_3 200xx101 beta_1 200xx200 release 200xx201 and later --- would not be not our doing.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Bill Stoddard
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Bill Stoddard
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Gonyou, Austin
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Gonyou, Austin
