On Friday 20 July 2001 15:14, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:08 PM
>
> > > We have also dropped the subrevision that was available in
> > > apache1.3. This seems very wrong to me. Thoughts?
> >
> > I can't parse this, what subrevision.
>
> the APACHE_RELEASE 10319100 constant.
>
> this could easily be adapted to the model I just described...
>
> 200xx000 devel
> 200xx001 alpha_1
> 200xx002 alpha_2
> 200xx003 alpha_3
> 200xx101 beta_1
> 200xx200 release
>
> 200xx201 and later --- would not be not our doing.
We weren't using that anywhere. Also, keeping this means that we are
storing revision information in two places, the server-string, and
the REVISION macro, oh, and the MMN. :-(
Ryan
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
