Roy,
Agreed, my bad, sorry. I conferred with the RM (who has little time for the phone,
never the less email for these few hours) and rbb suggested I push the tags.
I've moved them out of the way.
I'm looking for the 'superscript' to repackage the .tar files. Then I noted I simply
needed to repackage the changed files. They should be done within minutes.
We have also dropped the subrevision that was available in apache1.3. This seems
very wrong to me. Thoughts?
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
> Hey, what's going on with the retagging? There exists on developer dist:
>
> -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 5383847 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z
> -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc
> -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 3226188 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc
> -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 4305440 Jul 20 13:20 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip
> -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 477 Jul 20 13:16 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc
>
> which means that there are now two different versions of the source being
> called 2.0.21? That is bad.
>
> ....Roy
>
>
