Pieren wrote: >On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Arlindo Pereira ><[email protected]> wrote: >>we should not tag for the renderer > >I'm not talking about rendering but modeling. A covered road with a >limited height is a kind of tunnel. Or how do you tag a road covered >by a simple roof ? Many people do that. When a stream or a river goes >under ground through maybe a pipeline, I also tag it with "tunnel". >When a road goes below a bridge which is larger than longer, I also >tag the road as a "tunnel". If a road goes along a mountain which is >partially dug (one side and roof is the mountain, other side is open) >I also tag it as a "tunnel". >Pieren
Seems like a little over use of "tunnel" in my opinion, but I accept it as personal preference. And, it is a solution, where I don't necessarily have one at this point for all those cases. As far as wide bridges are concerned, I would probably not tag two lanes under six lanes as a tunnel, but would just use bridge for the six, and maxheight:physical= on a highway segment for the two. But, now I'm getting a bit off subject. -- Randy _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
