On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Randy <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that I've slept on it, I think that since in actuality the main > building is at the same level as the road, it makes sense to split the > building into two pieces, with one as the building proper, at layer=0, and > the other part as something like "building=shelter", at layer=1. There is > a wiki page discussing the use of amenity=shelter, primarily in terms of > camping shelters of various sorts. My preference would be > building=shelter, if that is enough different from amenity=shelter to be > used in a more general way. > > Then a relation to combine the two parts into a single bank of parts > building=yes, amenity=bank, and possibly building=shelter, > amenity=drive-in_bank;atm. That's a lot of work for what is actually a > pretty small bank building, but it comes closest to reflecting reality, I > think.
That tagging makes perfect sense to me. (Wait, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested earlier, isn't it?) I might start using it for gas stations and banks with drive-throughs like you described. -- David "Smith" a.k.a. Vid the Kid a.k.a. Bír'd'in Does this font make me look fat? _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
