I disagree. I think that different layer=N should be enough for the renderer draw the way over the building, the same way this works with different ways. Pure KISS. ;)
Cheers 2009/10/28 Randy <[email protected]> > David ``Smith'' wrote: > > >On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Randy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >That tagging makes perfect sense to me. (Wait, that's pretty much > >exactly what I suggested earlier, isn't it?) I might start using it > >for gas stations and banks with drive-throughs like you described. > > Yes, as a matter of fact, that was your suggestion. Since, then I've > reconsidered. I'm not suggesting not to do that (double negative?), but I > think a different or maybe additional tag of covered=yes would provide a > more general solution to covered highways, as well as making rendering > easier. See my last previous post. It could even be used for covered > bridges (highway=unclassified, bridge=yes, covered=yes) as well as any > other section of road under a covering, as previously discussed > (highway=service, covered=yes). > > In some ways this is tagging for the renderers, which, I guess, is pretty > much a no-no, but I think there is some merit for the additional tag as > informative information, as well. > > Guess I should throw this one to the tagging talk group. > > -- > Randy > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > -- Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr. Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - uniriotec.br Consultor de Software Livre da Uniriotec Consultoria - uniriotec.com Acadêmico: [email protected] Profissional: [email protected] Geral: [email protected] Tel.: +5521 92504072 Jabber/Google Talk: [email protected] Skype: nighto_sumomo Chave pública: BD065DEC
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
