inline

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sidar Ok <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Fabio
> I meant a look up, as in the pattern desc original, instead of an IoC.
> Something that gives a singleton logger, nothing big.
>
> @Ayende
>
> Why do you think it will create a huge amount of work, care to elaborate ?
>

NH does a lot of logging, all of which will have to be touched


>
> Secondly, I don't think the abstraction is not required, first it will make
> it possible to swap between loggers and log4net is not mandatory any more,


What is the point? I don't see any pain involve with this for our users.


> second, the configuration needed for Log4net, which is not a NH config,
> will not be needed anymore, reducing unnecessary complexity and noise in
> config.
>

Ha? You aren't going to change that, but instead of well known logging
configuration style, you are not going to support N configuration styles.


>
> It is not that I am up to start a crusade against log4net, but I also think
> that code will be in better shape with this abstraction provided over all
> too.
>
>
I am sorry, but I am afraid that I don't see this providing any value for
us.

Reply via email to