On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/3/14 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> > >> >> I have no objection to that, although I still don't see ROI. >> In general I don't like to satisfy future needs, I rather serve concrete >> needs. >> > > Well... nobody ask for ProxyFactoryFactory but then somebody use it... > Um, I assumed that was because of the issues that I was running into implementing proxies using PostSharp > nobody ask for events/listeners ("with gusto") but now many people are > using it. > Different issue, that is something that we ported from Hib > nobody ask for tuplizers, nobody ask for entity-mode, nobody ask for > entity-name > Same > nobody ask for a lot of features of NH2.0 but now many developers are using > new features. > > more then one are asking for logging abstraction. > > I understand "serve concrete needs"; should we talk about "serve concrete > needs" of who ? > -- > Fabio Maulo >
