> There is really no way to patent electrolysis devices,

why not? do you have any links to read a little more about it?


On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:51 PM, stanley/ Randolph <[email protected]>wrote:

> Alo,
> If you are really interested, I make my own hydrogen generators, and I can
> sell you one..  As for warranty, adding hydrogen to the mix makes your
> engine burn the fuel cleaner and therefore last longer. My old Dodge
> Dynasty's oil, at only 97,000 miles, was black 500 miles after an oil change
> when I bought it, and would *not* burn rubber;  after about 5,000 miles
> with a hydroxy addition to the mix, the oil was clean and stayed clean and
> it would spin the tires at a standstill if I punched the pedal too hard,
> especially if the road was wet.
> My model only draws 2.8 amps and produces about as much hydrogen and oxygen
> as units others sell, which draw 20 - 30 amps, and boil the solution out.
> This month I will have one of either ABS or PVC plastic for my 450, which
> will also be legal soon and I will see now much that increases *its*mileage.
> The only drawback is the element only lasts about two months because of it
> being thin wire.  My first one only lasted a few hours because I used 304
> stainless, because there was none of the good stuff around.  But this Rodeo
> that I use only gets 16 mpg without it, on the road; I just took a trip with
> it *and* with the air on, and it made 23.9 mpg!  Was *I* surprised!
> I have been working on this thing for about three and a half years now and
> have gone through four "generations" of units to arrive at this one.  I have
> also looked at many different types that others make on the net, and have
> stuck to this particular type. made of wire instead of plates or rods.
> There is another one that someone makes that is really good and lasts,
> having a year warranty, but it is over $2,400, and draws about the usual 20
> amps.  In his discussion, he admits that none of them currently on the
> market really last more than a few months, maybe a year.  But the materials
> he uses are not exactly different, but there is more of the rods.
> Mine is less than $125 and is easily renewed with fresh wire when the old
> wears thin.  I include extra wire, and an extra card already wired and
> ready for exchange, in the kit.  Or if you prefer not to have to re-wire the
> card, I can send you a replacement already wired if you send the old one,
> since wiring can be troublesome.
> I am not the one that invented it; someone else did, but I improved upon
> his idea.
> He sells the complete plans for $100, and you have to find the sources for
> the materials to make your own; and of course you need your own tools also,
> for fabrication.
> There is really no way to patent electrolysis devices, so I have no patent,
> I just make and sell them as reasonably as I can for those who don't want to
> or are unable to do it themselves.
> There are several devices out there that produce enough hydrogen to run
> your car solely on hydrogen; I even have the plans for one such.  However,
> it is a dangerous thing to have others know about, because people have been
> arrested and even killed for their efforts, running their automobiles (or
> motorcycles) on water *instead* of gas, and sharing it with others.
> Just let me know, Aldo.
> **
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Aldo <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 1, 2009 5:16:13 PM
>
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Arrghh...I am SO FRUSTRATED...
>
>  I do use 91 only from Mobil or 76 too… may make a little difference. The
> fuel at some other stations in my area particularly Arco is terrible.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected] ] *On Behalf Of *Aldo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Arrghh...I am SO FRUSTRATED...
>
>
>
> All I did was put an K&N intake and flowmaster exhaust… increased my mpg a
> bit. I want to install a hydrogen boost system to further increase my mpg
> but the truck came with a great warranty and has been great so I am trying
> to leave it alone… for somebody like me it is really difficult not to tinker
> :p I have been trying to keep busy with the bikes.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected] ] *On Behalf Of *Graham Rogers
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:59 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Arrghh...I am SO FRUSTRATED...
>
>
>
> My son has the same truck, same year but it has plenty of get up and go. Of
> course he's always trying to get up and go faster. He gets about 15 mpg. My
> Tacoma is about as fast and as Aldo said ....  Hey Aldo, how come you get 22
> - all I get is 20 and less on the highway at 70 mpg.
>
>
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Aldo wrote:
>
>
>
> There is plenty you can do to make your truck faster but none of it is
> worth the $$ …The Silverado weighs more and has shorter gears…. It is slower
> but can haul more… Get a Toyota ! My Pre-Runner is a rocket and gets around
> 22mpg out of a 250hp 4.0L V6 J
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected] ] *On Behalf Of *Kyle Munz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:01 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: Arrghh...I am SO FRUSTRATED...
>
>
>
> Release the parking brake?
>
> -Kyle
>
>  On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:59 PM, NghthwkLvr (NL) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> this is actually off-topic...but i've got to get it off my chest, and
> see if anyone can give me any suggestions...
>
> My first vehicle, that i paid for and owned outright is a 1991 GMC
> Sonoma-S15 Pickup truck...SLE model...with a 4.3 L engine!....
>
> My second vehicle is of course my beloved 1984 Honda Nighthawk
> CB650SC...
>
> My third vehicle, that i paid cash for and own outright, is a lovely
> looking black 2003 Chevy Silverado Ext Cab Pickup Truck...LS
> model...with a 5.8L engine!...
>
> so what's the problem you ask? well the problem is that the 2003 5.8L
> engine has absolutely NO GET UP AND GO!!!!!....
>
> if i raced both truck from zero to 60, the 91 GMC would easily leave
> the 03 Chevy back at the starting line trying to figure out what the
> hell is going on!!!....
>
> i don't think either of these engines have any modifications, but
> still....the difference in get up and go is like night and day...
>
> i was on the freeway today, trying to pass a truck so i could change
> lanes...well, i was going all of 60 mph...and so was the truck, which
> was actually slowing down cause he was trying to change lanes also...i
> was going left...he was going right...anyway...i kept pressing the gas
> to try to speed up...and MY truck just would not accelerate...it took
> at least 15 seconds for it to get up to 66 mph...
>
> then a couple of miles down the road, i tried to jump in the fast lane
> at 60 mph...and almost got rear ended while i tried to
> accelerate!....i don't do this all the time because i know the truck
> doesn't have any get up and go...but i was in a bit of a hurry
> today...damn it!...
>
> so what the hell is going on!
>
> any suggestions on what i can do to get the 5.8 liter engine some get
> up and go?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> -NghthwkLvr-
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2211 - Release Date: 06/30/09
> 11:37:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2211 - Release Date: 06/30/09
> 11:37:00
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2211 - Release Date: 06/30/09
> 11:37:00
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to