The reason I see for doing a 'cd distro' of one chunk of software is to make it an 'appliance'.
Some things make sense that way. I like the idea of having a distro install for the 'un-initiaed' and where it makes sense, AND having the 'package' so it can integrate into my current 'desktop' or 'server' distro that I prefer without having to deal with a lot of the menushia of building from source. ><> ... Jack On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 23, 2009, at 8:36 AM, JMJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Duh, why did I not think to search the 64Studio site before now? > > [sigh] > > Oh well. > > > > So, here's what I found: > > http://www.64studio.com/node/1176 > > > > Basically, the tetex-bin source files are now over 5 years old. The > > work-around is to change your system clock before installing 64Studio. > > > > The idea that we need a whole distro for this is madness. > Surely there is a meta package that can install studio 64 from ubuntu > or debian repos. > > Andrew > > I may try that today if I get time. > > > > I wonder if that would also solve the issue I had with the 3.0 beta?? > > > > JMJ > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
