Ralph wrote:

> I suggest sortm without specifying a set of messages be an
> error.  Old behaviour can be got through `sortm all' or a new
> option that folks can put in ~/.mh_profile if they're happy
> with it as it was.

I agree.  I don't see a need for that new option.

This should do it, along with updates to the man page
and test suite:

--- a/uip/sortm.c
+++ b/uip/sortm.c
@@ -169,3 +169,3 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
     if (!msgs.size)
-       app_msgarg(&msgs, "all");
+       adios (NULL, "must specify messages to sort");

David

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to