Steve wrote: > Seems like the real problem is that "sortm" shoulda been named > "sortf". But I assume that ship sailed a long time ago.
Yes, but given that sortm can sortm can sort specified messages, it makes sense to me. How about: 1) change sortm to require msg argument 2) add a sortf that defaults to "all" and exec's sortm David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
