Kevin Cosgrove <[email protected]> writes: > On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of >> using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete >> folder. > > I have two use cases for sortm > > 1. sortm +folder > > 2. sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +folder
Me too. I don't think I've ever used sortm with a sequence. Glad -all became the default. Throwing an error if explicit messages were not specified would have broken MH-E. -- Bill Wohler <[email protected]> aka <[email protected]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
