> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:00:24 -0400
> From: Paul Fox <p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us>
> Message-ID: <20161012160024.c92015182...@grass.foxharp.boston.ma.us>
> | so you still might not know that you've left a blank To: header.
> There's nothing wrong with that - Norm's issue was that sometimes he was
> sending to no-one but himself, not which header the addresses appear in.
oh, right. i'd forgotten the details.
> Technically (as far as the e-mail standards go) there's no difference at
> all between To and cc - it's all just human factors (bcc, if it contains
> addresses, is just the same). Addresses in "to" is supposed to indicate
> primary recipients, and "cc" recipients that are just included for info only.
i feel as if i've used an MUA at some point which got confused by a an
empty or missing To header, but trying the couple i have on hand, none
seem to care. perhaps it was mailing list software. in any case, i
understand your point.
paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 51.8 degrees)
Nmh-workers mailing list