> Paul F wrote:
> > > I put one in this message. (And also an Nmh-Attach: header, which will
> > > get scrubbed out, see below.)
> > great! so there's no problem. ;-) :-)
> In case my point was missed: the Attach: header was not scrubbed out.
sure, but that's a bug. and (i think) we could catch those bugs with
a test script.
> > i'd think adding an "X-Mailer: nmh-1.6" header would help even more.
> > (i confess i'm a little surprised that we don't already emit such a
> > header. i see that exmh does.)
> "X-" headers are deprecated by RFC 6648. We could add, say, a Mailer
okay -- whatever's the right thing.
paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 61.7 degrees)
Nmh-workers mailing list