david wrote:
 > Paul F wrote:
 > >  > I put one in this message.  (And also an Nmh-Attach: header, which will
 > >  > get scrubbed out, see below.)
 > >
 > > great!  so there's no problem.  ;-) :-)
 > In case my point was missed:  the Attach: header was not scrubbed out.

sure, but that's a bug.  and (i think) we could catch those bugs with
a test script.

 > > i'd think adding an "X-Mailer: nmh-1.6" header would help even more. 
 > > (i confess i'm a little surprised that we don't already emit such a
 > > header.  i see that exmh does.)
 > "X-" headers are deprecated by RFC 6648.  We could add, say, a Mailer
 > header.

okay -- whatever's the right thing.

paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 61.7 degrees)

Nmh-workers mailing list

Reply via email to