Hi Paul, > > In case my point was missed: the Attach: header was not scrubbed > > out. > > sure, but that's a bug. and (i think) we could catch those bugs with > a test script.
I don't have the relevant switch to have Attach processed automatically so it getting through isn't a bug, and I might even be trying to communicate with some issue tracker that wants that header. And then there's catching the Atach header. > > > i'd think adding an "X-Mailer: nmh-1.6" header would help even > > > more. > > > > "X-" headers are deprecated by RFC 6648. We could add, say, a > > Mailer header. > > okay -- whatever's the right thing. I tend to think those (X-)?Mailer headers are a bit of a waste of space and time. The same value in thousands of copies of emails. All those bytes, clock cycles, etc., when nothing cares about the value. nmh doesn't produce the message ID normally, but with MIME it does cook up «boundary="----- =_aaaaaaaaaa0"» and it did occur to me the other day that it could be more interesting than that without getting longer and still allowing for it to be bumped and be unique. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
