Paul F wrote: > sure, but that's a bug.
I'm not sure about that. What if the user has a legitimate reason to use a such a header? And we can't predict all such pseudoheader names out into the future. nmh should squat on the Nmh- namespace to severely minimize this issue. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmhfirstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers