I wrote:

> >
> > And Minoru's recent contributions have reminded me of the title of an 
> > article I read in the "Economist" 15 years back, entitled "Why Taro Can't 
> > Think".
> >
> 

And Minoru responded:

> And JM seems to have reduced himself to nothing but personal attacks.
> What a waste (his money, time to travel abroad, reading and education)!
> 

Minoru,

Well, you opened a can of worms, and I am just putting a lid back on it. If you 
write a post implying that I have manufactured facts, you had better be 
prepared to put up your fists. Typical. Just like Alan, you can dish it out, 
but you just can't take it, can you?

I might as well say one last thing to you that I have held back so far. Your 
arguments about the Rape of Nanjing are identical to those of Holcaust deniers. 
Same old BS: Laboriously question the evidence, with the most absurd 
counter-arguments. Attack the integrity of the people who produce it, and 
accuse the governments of the victims of engaging in propaganda. Cite dubious 
historical evidence to show that mass murder is common, so why should 
Germany/Japan be singled out? 

Normally, Minoru, most objective people who hear such denials about the 
Holocaust just shake their heads in disgust. The ones who know the truth of 
Japan's crimes do the same when they hear denials of the Rape of Nanjing, or 
the "Three Alls" policy, or the comfort women. 

If you were uneducated, perhaps I could understand how you could parrot such 
vile and offensive right wing propaganda. But that is obviously not the case, 
so there is just no excuse. 

Don't you feel any shame at all?


John M.





















--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Persons posting messages to not_honyaku  assume all responsibility for 
their messages. The list owner does not review messages prior to posting, 
and accepts no responsibility for the content of messages posted.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to