DonalEvans commented on a change in pull request #6351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6351#discussion_r627707193



##########
File path: 
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/xmlcache/CacheCreation.java
##########
@@ -1115,6 +1116,11 @@ public void unlockDiskStore(String diskStoreName) {
 
   }
 
+  @Override
+  public boolean hasMemberOlderThan(KnownVersion version) {
+    return false;

Review comment:
       I wonder if, for this method, it would make sense to follow the approach 
used elsewhere in this class where we throw an UnsupportedOperationException 
rather than returning an effectively meaningless value. I think that there's no 
scenario in which it would make sense to call this method on a `CacheCreation`.

##########
File path: 
geode-lucene/src/upgradeTest/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueryWithDifferentVersions.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more 
contributor license
+ * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional 
information regarding
+ * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache 
License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the 
License. You may obtain a
+ * copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 
distributed under the License
+ * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY 
KIND, either express
+ * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions 
and limitations under
+ * the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.geode.cache.lucene;
+
+import static org.apache.geode.test.awaitility.GeodeAwaitility.await;
+import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
+import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.catchThrowable;
+
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import org.apache.geode.cache.RegionShortcut;
+import org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.InternalLocator;
+import org.apache.geode.internal.AvailablePortHelper;
+import org.apache.geode.test.dunit.DistributedTestUtils;
+import org.apache.geode.test.dunit.Host;
+import org.apache.geode.test.dunit.NetworkUtils;
+import org.apache.geode.test.dunit.VM;
+
+public class LuceneQueryWithDifferentVersions
+    extends LuceneSearchWithRollingUpgradeDUnit {
+
+  // 2 locator, 2 servers
+  @Test
+  public void luceneQueryCannotBeExecuted()
+      throws Exception {
+    final Host host = Host.getHost(0);
+    VM locator1 = host.getVM(oldVersion, 0);
+    VM locator2 = host.getVM(oldVersion, 1);
+    VM server1 = host.getVM(oldVersion, 2);
+    VM server2 = host.getVM(oldVersion, 3);
+
+    final String regionName = "aRegion";
+    RegionShortcut shortcut = RegionShortcut.PARTITION_REDUNDANT;
+    String regionType = "partitionedRedundant";
+
+    int[] locatorPorts = AvailablePortHelper.getRandomAvailableTCPPorts(2);
+    locator1.invoke(() -> 
DistributedTestUtils.deleteLocatorStateFile(locatorPorts));
+    locator2.invoke(() -> 
DistributedTestUtils.deleteLocatorStateFile(locatorPorts));
+
+    String hostName = NetworkUtils.getServerHostName(host);
+    String locatorString = getLocatorString(locatorPorts);
+    try {
+      locator1.invoke(
+          invokeStartLocator(hostName, locatorPorts[0], 
getLocatorPropertiesPre91(locatorString)));
+      locator2.invoke(
+          invokeStartLocator(hostName, locatorPorts[1], 
getLocatorPropertiesPre91(locatorString)));
+      
invokeRunnableInVMs(invokeCreateCache(getSystemProperties(locatorPorts)), 
server1, server2);
+
+      // Locators before 1.4 handled configuration asynchronously.
+      // We must wait for configuration configuration to be ready, or confirm 
that it is disabled.
+      locator1.invoke(
+          () -> await().untilAsserted(() -> await().untilAsserted(() -> {
+            
assertThat(InternalLocator.getLocator().isSharedConfigurationRunning()).isTrue();
+          })));
+      locator2.invoke(
+          () -> await()
+              .untilAsserted(() -> await().untilAsserted(() -> {
+                
assertThat(InternalLocator.getLocator().isSharedConfigurationRunning()).isTrue();
+              })));
+
+      server1.invoke(() -> createLuceneIndex(cache, regionName, INDEX_NAME));
+      server2.invoke(() -> createLuceneIndex(cache, regionName, INDEX_NAME));
+
+      invokeRunnableInVMs(invokeCreateRegion(regionName, shortcut.name()), 
server1, server2);
+
+      putSerializableObjectAndVerifyLuceneQueryResult(server1, regionName, 10, 
0,
+          10, server1, server2);
+      locator1 = rollLocatorToCurrent(locator1, hostName, locatorPorts[0], 
getTestMethodName(),
+          locatorString);
+
+      locator2 = rollLocatorToCurrent(locator2, hostName, locatorPorts[1], 
getTestMethodName(),
+          locatorString);
+
+      server1 = rollServerToCurrentCreateLuceneIndexAndCreateRegion(server1, 
regionType, null,
+          shortcut.name(), regionName, locatorPorts, reindex);
+
+      Throwable thrown = catchThrowable(() -> {
+        putSerializableObjectAndVerifyLuceneQueryResult(server2, regionName, 
20, 15,
+            25, server2);
+      });
+
+      assertThat(thrown.getCause()).isInstanceOf(AssertionError.class);

Review comment:
       It looks like the failure is happening before the Lucene query even 
begins, since `waitUntilFlushed()` is returning false rather than the expected 
true. This appears to be because the wait times out, and I also see logging 
related to stuck Pooled Waiting Message Processor threads, and the message 
"During normal processing, unsuccessfully dispatched 1 events (batch #0)" being 
logged repeatedly. This seems like unwanted behaviour, that should be looked 
into further, as we shouldn't be getting stuck like this if the safeguards in 
this PR are working as intended.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to