Reliable source then.

________________________________

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
Sent: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill 


One of the Wolves team gets his hair cut in a place next to the pub where my 
dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off to Everton for cash plus Ross 
Barkley and the cash is being spent on Lecott is coming back.  
 

 
On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote:


        Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for 
Jarvis and us buying another (potential replacement) winger are a cunning plan 
to make some $$$ ? 


        On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew 
<[email protected]> wrote:
        

                I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren 
Bent and we get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if 
we just spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well 
clear of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't 
realise Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we 
offered Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then. 
Definitely.
                 
________________________________

                From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mark worrall
                Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM 

                To: [email protected]
                Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
                

                Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh. 

                We need another Paul Ince right now. :-)
                
                

                On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]> wrote:
                

                        I’ve had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both 
players and Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis.  Could be a good signing.  
Jarvis’ return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor.

                         

                        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                        Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM
                        To: [email protected]
                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

                         

                         

                         
<http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg>
 

                        
                         

                        On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]> wrote:

                        Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than 
Jarvis.

                         

                        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                        Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM
                        To: nswolves
                        Subject: [BTMO] Hammill

                         

                        Seems like a good signing.  Super Mick strikes again. 

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        The information contained in this email is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or 
use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. 
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The 
views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views 
or opinions of Macquarie.

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        


                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT 
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or 
used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                


        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to