Why sell Jarvis when he is one of our best player's? No need at the moment, he is under contract and we can sell him if we go down. Another WUM! 2 - 1 to the Wolves on Saturday! Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:08:06 To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves player. I know which player it is too. On 21 January 2011 17:16, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote: > Reliable source then. > > ------------------------------ > *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> > *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> > *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011 > *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill > > One of the Wolves team gets his hair cut in a place next to the pub where > my dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off to Everton for cash plus > Ross Barkley and the cash is being spent on Lecott is coming back. > > > > On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall <markworr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for >> Jarvis and us buying another (potential replacement) winger are a cunning >> plan to make some $$$ ? >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew < >> matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> wrote: >> >>> I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren Bent and we >>> get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if we just >>> spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well clear >>> of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't realise >>> Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we offered >>> Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then. Definitely. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *mark worrall >>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM >>> >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>> >>> Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh. >>> >>> We need another Paul Ince right now. :-) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry < >>> marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I’ve had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both players and >>>> Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis. Could be a good signing. Jarvis’ >>>> return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM >>>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than Jarvis. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM >>>> *To:* nswolves >>>> *Subject:* [BTMO] Hammill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Seems like a good signing. Super Mick strikes again. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >>>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >>>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not >>>> guarantee >>>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >>>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of >>>> Macquarie. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This >>> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the >>> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed >>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily >>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>> recipient. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
