I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves player. I know which player it is too.
On 21 January 2011 17:16, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: > Reliable source then. > > ------------------------------ > *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]> > *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011 > *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill > > One of the Wolves team gets his hair cut in a place next to the pub where > my dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off to Everton for cash plus > Ross Barkley and the cash is being spent on Lecott is coming back. > > > > On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for >> Jarvis and us buying another (potential replacement) winger are a cunning >> plan to make some $$$ ? >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren Bent and we >>> get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if we just >>> spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well clear >>> of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't realise >>> Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we offered >>> Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then. Definitely. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>> Behalf Of *mark worrall >>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>> >>> Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh. >>> >>> We need another Paul Ince right now. :-) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I’ve had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both players and >>>> Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis. Could be a good signing. Jarvis’ >>>> return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than Jarvis. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM >>>> *To:* nswolves >>>> *Subject:* [BTMO] Hammill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Seems like a good signing. Super Mick strikes again. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >>>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >>>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not >>>> guarantee >>>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >>>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of >>>> Macquarie. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This >>> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the >>> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed >>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily >>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>> recipient. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
