The comparable stats have Jarvis with 4 assists.  It's only one goal
difference, which is hardly statistically significant.  I note that the
Actim stats you use have Hahnemann in the Premier League team of the
season.  They must be really good stats.

On 21 January 2011 21:23, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote:

> I'm sure the Actim Index doesn't factor is the quality of the opponent but
> I'm more than happy to flog Jarvis to the highest bidder. Aside from running
> around a lot I don't think Jarvis has added anything that Ward couldn't
> provide (and that's saying something).
>
> I don't see how you can compare 2 goals & 2 assists from 21 games against
> any of the 3 you have listed. Aside from Hleb who has mainly made substitute
> appearances, the others have better stats from less appearances. Just accept
> that Jarvis is pants and we could make £10 million quid if we can find some
> sucker willing to buy him.
>
> ------------------------------
>  *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
> *To*: nswolves <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 21:17:00 2011
> *Subject*: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill
>
>
> And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point.  We
> established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and
> that's why you hold a grudge.
>
> As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take
> account of one playing against premier league opposition and one playing
> against Championship opposition.
>
> Jarvis is also ranked 78th in the Premier league, above great wingers such
> as Luk Modric.
>
> The stats I've got say it's 2 goals and 4 assists
>
> What have the other good wingers in lower ranked teams got
>
> Rodriguez (LIV) 16p 3g 1a
> Kuyt (LIV) 17p 4g 3a
> NZogbia (WIG) 18p 3g 3a
> Hleb (BIR) 14p 1g 1 a
>
> The last two are very highly rated footballers.  Jarvis's stats are on a
> par.
>
> It's great to be back.  There's nothing like that feeling of being right
> all the time.
>
>
>
> On 21 January 2011 18:25, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote:
>
>> Why sell Jarvis when he is one of our best player's?
>> No need at the moment, he is under contract and we can sell him if we go
>> down.
>> Another WUM!
>> 2 - 1 to the Wolves on Saturday!
>> He looks flash but adds nothing. 2 assists in 21 games and 2 goals from 25
>> shots. That's not premier league quality (or England international quality).
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 18:23:06 2011
>> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
>>
>> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: * Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com>
>> *Sender: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Date: *Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:08:06 +1100
>> *To: *<nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>> *ReplyTo: * nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject: *Re: [BTMO] Hammill
>>
>> I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves player. I know
>> which player it is too.
>>
>> On 21 January 2011 17:16, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Reliable source then.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>  *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>>> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
>>> *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011
>>> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
>>>
>>> One of the Wolves teamgets his hair cut in a place next to the pub where
>>> my dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off toEverton for cash plus Ross
>>> Barkleyand the cash is being spent onLecott is coming back.
>>>
>>> On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall <markworr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for
>>>> Jarvis and us buying another(potential replacement)winger are a cunning 
>>>> plan
>>>> to make some $$$ ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew <
>>>> matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren Bent and
>>>>> we get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if we
>>>>> just spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well
>>>>> clear of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't
>>>>> realise Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we
>>>>> offered Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then.
>>>>> Definitely.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
>>>>> *On Behalf Of *mark worrall
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill
>>>>>
>>>>>  Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need another Paul Ince right now. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry <
>>>>> marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Ive had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both players and
>>>>>> Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis. Could be a good signing. Jarvis
>>>>>> return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM
>>>>>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry <
>>>>>> marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than Jarvis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM
>>>>>> *To:* nswolves
>>>>>> *Subject:* [BTMO] Hammill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like a good signing. Super Mick strikes again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are
>>>>>> not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
>>>>>> guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
>>>>>> opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
>>>>>> opinions of Macquarie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE:
>>>>> This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used 
>>>>> by
>>>>> the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
>>>>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
>>>>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
>>>>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views 
>>>>> expressed
>>>>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not 
>>>>> necessarily
>>>>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
>>>>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
>>>>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
>>>>> recipient.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>
>> --
>> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>>
>
>
>  --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to