The comparable stats have Jarvis with 4 assists. It's only one goal difference, which is hardly statistically significant. I note that the Actim stats you use have Hahnemann in the Premier League team of the season. They must be really good stats.
On 21 January 2011 21:23, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm sure the Actim Index doesn't factor is the quality of the opponent but > I'm more than happy to flog Jarvis to the highest bidder. Aside from running > around a lot I don't think Jarvis has added anything that Ward couldn't > provide (and that's saying something). > > I don't see how you can compare 2 goals & 2 assists from 21 games against > any of the 3 you have listed. Aside from Hleb who has mainly made substitute > appearances, the others have better stats from less appearances. Just accept > that Jarvis is pants and we could make £10 million quid if we can find some > sucker willing to buy him. > > ------------------------------ > *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]> > *To*: nswolves <[email protected]> > *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 21:17:00 2011 > *Subject*: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill > > > And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point. We > established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and > that's why you hold a grudge. > > As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take > account of one playing against premier league opposition and one playing > against Championship opposition. > > Jarvis is also ranked 78th in the Premier league, above great wingers such > as Luk Modric. > > The stats I've got say it's 2 goals and 4 assists > > What have the other good wingers in lower ranked teams got > > Rodriguez (LIV) 16p 3g 1a > Kuyt (LIV) 17p 4g 3a > NZogbia (WIG) 18p 3g 3a > Hleb (BIR) 14p 1g 1 a > > The last two are very highly rated footballers. Jarvis's stats are on a > par. > > It's great to be back. There's nothing like that feeling of being right > all the time. > > > > On 21 January 2011 18:25, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Why sell Jarvis when he is one of our best player's? >> No need at the moment, he is under contract and we can sell him if we go >> down. >> Another WUM! >> 2 - 1 to the Wolves on Saturday! >> He looks flash but adds nothing. 2 assists in 21 games and 2 goals from 25 >> shots. That's not premier league quality (or England international quality). >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 18:23:06 2011 >> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill >> >> Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Steven Millward <[email protected]> >> *Sender: * [email protected] >> *Date: *Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:08:06 +1100 >> *To: *<[email protected]> >> *ReplyTo: * [email protected] >> *Subject: *Re: [BTMO] Hammill >> >> I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves player. I know >> which player it is too. >> >> On 21 January 2011 17:16, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Reliable source then. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> *Sent*: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011 >>> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>> >>> One of the Wolves teamgets his hair cut in a place next to the pub where >>> my dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off toEverton for cash plus Ross >>> Barkleyand the cash is being spent onLecott is coming back. >>> >>> On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of other clubs coming in for >>>> Jarvis and us buying another(potential replacement)winger are a cunning >>>> plan >>>> to make some $$$ ? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 24 million on Darren Bent and >>>>> we get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our ambition eh? Surely if we >>>>> just spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up front) we'd be well >>>>> clear of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We obviously didn't >>>>> realise Bent was available but every player has his price. I reckon if we >>>>> offered Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up then. >>>>> Definitely. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> *On Behalf Of *mark worrall >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>>>> >>>>> Yet another debatable signing from a team lower than us. Sigh. >>>>> >>>>> We need another Paul Ince right now. :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marcus Chantry < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ive had a look at the Actim Index numbers for both players and >>>>>> Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis. Could be a good signing. Jarvis >>>>>> return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor. >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hammill >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus Chantry < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot better than Jarvis. >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM >>>>>> *To:* nswolves >>>>>> *Subject:* [BTMO] Hammill >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems like a good signing. Super Mick strikes again. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>>> >>>>>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are >>>>>> not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information >>>>>> in >>>>>> this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not >>>>>> guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or >>>>>> opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or >>>>>> opinions of Macquarie. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: >>>>> This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used >>>>> by >>>>> the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>>>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>>>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>>>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views >>>>> expressed >>>>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not >>>>> necessarily >>>>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>>>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>>>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>>>> recipient. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
