Don't let stats get in the way of a good story. The simple matter is Jarvis is 
shite and if someone is willing to give us decent money for 2 or 4 assists from 
21 games then show me the money. Hammill can't be any worse. 


________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
Sent: Fri Jan 21 21:33:42 2011
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill 


The comparable stats have Jarvis with 4 assists.  It's only one goal 
difference, which is hardly statistically significant.  I note that the Actim 
stats you use have Hahnemann in the Premier League team of the season.  They 
must be really good stats.


On 21 January 2011 21:23, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:


        I'm sure the Actim Index doesn't factor is the quality of the opponent 
but I'm more than happy to flog Jarvis to the highest bidder. Aside from 
running around a lot I don't think Jarvis has added anything that Ward couldn't 
provide (and that's saying something). 
        
        I don't see how you can compare 2 goals & 2 assists from 21 games 
against any of the 3 you have listed. Aside from Hleb who has mainly made 
substitute appearances, the others have better stats from less appearances. 
Just accept that Jarvis is pants and we could make £10 million quid if we can 
find some sucker willing to buy him. 
        

________________________________

        
        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
        
        To: nswolves <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
        Sent: Fri Jan 21 21:17:00 2011
        Subject: Fwd: [BTMO] Hammill 
        
        

        And yet he got named in the provisional England squad at one point.  We 
established some time ago that he got between you and Mick in Perth and that's 
why you hold a grudge.
        
        As for comparing his and Hammill's Actim Index numbers, does that take 
account of one playing against premier league opposition and one playing 
against Championship opposition.
        
        Jarvis is also ranked 78th in the Premier league, above great wingers 
such as Luk Modric.
        
        The stats I've got say it's 2 goals and 4 assists
        
        What have the other good wingers in lower ranked teams got
        
        Rodriguez (LIV) 16p 3g 1a
        Kuyt (LIV) 17p 4g 3a
        NZogbia (WIG) 18p 3g 3a
        Hleb (BIR) 14p 1g 1 a
        
        The last two are very highly rated footballers.  Jarvis's stats are on 
a par.
        
        It's great to be back.  There's nothing like that feeling of being 
right all the time.
        



        On 21 January 2011 18:25, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> 
wrote:
        

                Why sell Jarvis when he is one of our best player's?
                No need at the moment, he is under contract and we can sell him 
if we go down.
                Another WUM!
                2 - 1 to the Wolves on Saturday!
                He looks flash but adds nothing. 2 assists in 21 games and 2 
goals from 25 shots. That's not premier league quality (or England 
international quality). 

________________________________

                
                From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                
                Sent: Fri Jan 21 18:23:06 2011
                Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill 
                
                

                Sent via BlackBerry from Telstra

________________________________

                From: Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> 
                Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
                Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:08:06 +1100
                To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
                ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
                Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

                I don't see how you get much more reliable than a Wolves 
player. I know which player it is too.
                
                
                On 21 January 2011 17:16, Marcus Chantry 
<marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
                

                        Reliable source then.
                        

________________________________

                        
                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
<nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
<nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                        
                        Sent: Fri Jan 21 17:07:09 2011
                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill 
                        
                        
                        One of the Wolves teamgets his hair cut in a place next 
to the pub where my dad drinks. The rumour is that Jarvis is off toEverton for 
cash plus Ross Barkleyand the cash is being spent onLecott is coming back. 

                        On 21 January 2011 16:32, mark worrall 
<markworr...@gmail.com> wrote:
                        

                                Just a thought... but I wonder if rumours of 
other clubs coming in for Jarvis and us buying another(potential 
replacement)winger are a cunning plan to make some $$$ ? 


                                On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, LEESE Matthew 
<matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> wrote:
                                

                                        I'm deflated as right now. Villa spend 
24 million on Darren Bent and we get Adam Hammill for half a mil. Where's our 
ambition eh? Surely if we just spent 24 million on a striker (and played him up 
front) we'd be well clear of this relegation fight we find ourselves in. We 
obviously didn't realise Bent was available but every player has his price. I 
reckon if we offered Chelsea 24 million for Drogba they'd sell. We'd stay up 
then. Definitely.
                                        
________________________________

                                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall
                                        Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 2:01 PM 

                                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill
                                        

                                        Yet another debatable signing from a 
team lower than us. Sigh. 

                                        We need another Paul Ince right now. :-)
                                        
                                        

                                        On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, 
Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
                                        

                                        Ive had a look at the Actim Index 
numbers for both players and Hammill scores much higher than Jarvis. Could be a 
good signing. Jarvis return of 2 goals and 2 assists in 21 matches is very poor.

                                        

                                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                                        Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 1:43 PM
                                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hammill

                                        

                                        

                                         
<http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://hubba-u.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sad_face.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/living/what-is-your-worst-blizzard-nightmare/question-1412429/%3Fpage%3D3&usg=__3cMaLjwuQ-f8KP60I2R9ch3_z6o=&h=271&w=241&sz=16&hl=en&start=13&sig2=LrP9CYjXd-MPYwbut51nWA&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=jyamnE_afC0bTM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmiserable%2Bface%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=qfI4TamoDoTyvQPvu4CMCg>
 

                                        
                                        

                                        On 21 January 2011 12:43, Marcus 
Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:

                                        Lets hope he can cross a ball and shoot 
better than Jarvis.

                                        

                                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                                        Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 12:35 PM
                                        To: nswolves
                                        Subject: [BTMO] Hammill

                                        

                                        Seems like a good signing. Super Mick 
strikes again. 

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                                        The information contained in this email 
is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or 
use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. 
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The 
views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views 
or opinions of Macquarie.

                                        

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                                        

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                                        

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                                        


                                        

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                                        Before printing, please consider the 
environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are 
intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and 
may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is 
waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible 
for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views 
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not 
necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please 
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not 
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended 
recipient. 

                                        

                                        -- 
                                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                                        


                                

                                -- 
                                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                                


                        

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        

                        

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        


                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                

                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                

                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                



        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        

        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to