That will give you 252 hosts so that will work for a long time to come in
your case... 255.255.255.192 is probably your best bet
����----------------------------------����
Jim Scott
Network Administrator
Hinda Incentives, Inc.
(773) 890-5900 x3437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
����----------------------------------����
|--------+--------------------------------->
| | "Robert Saylors" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
| | Sent by: |
| | bounce-nt2000-136315@ls|
| | .swynk.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 10/21/2002 02:50 PM |
| | Please respond to "NT |
| | 2000 Discussions" |
| | |
|--------+--------------------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: IP addresses can not be used
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
how about 255.255.255.0 for a subnet?
Thank you,
Robert Saylors
Technical Services Manager
FoxBerry Incorporated
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-nt2000-137228@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Ken Coughlin
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:48 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: IP addresses can not be used
Using a 255.255.255.224 subnet mask will only allow for 30 hosts. Assuming
you're using one for your default gateway, that leaves 29. The first and
last addresses are un-usable.
You should use a subnet mask of 255.255.255.192 which will allow you 62
hosts.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Saylors [mailto:rsaylors@;foxberry.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:39 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: IP addresses can not be used
I have a network with 31 workstations with a Windows 2k server. IP
addresses
are statically assigned - it has a LAN modem that 26 station can use to
access the Internet. Whenever I assign an address above 192.168.1.29 that
station can not see the server or any other network resource. I am using
255.255.255.224 subnet mask - I have verified that the subnet mask is the
same on server and station - assign below 192.168.1.30 and all is well. Any
hints?
Thank you,
Thank you,
Robert Saylors
Technical Services Manager
FoxBerry Incorporated
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
��z˛���m�Z��܆+ލ�� +r�z�m����
,�)�r���+^��r �y�܅�)N�����r��zǧu��jy �����^j���m4�]�ׯ ��0�y �
