On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 17:22, luigi scarso wrote:
>>> For me, pstopdf is a number one candidate to luafication :)
>>> (Had problems with it recently)
>> yes, will be done (we use it here in workflows with massive amounts of
>> conversions, auto downsampling, etc)
> If I understand well, pstopdf uses ghostscript .
> "luafication" will use ghostscript again ?

Unless Hans rewrites the whole GS interpreter ... yes.

The problem is that current pstopdf doesn't work reliably for me (no
way to do EPSCrop, sometimes wrong paper orientation, the graphic
missing completely ...), so I usually stick to ps2pdf (perl or shell,
I think) or just call gs manually.

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to